Reviews
Since Requiem of the Human Soul was published in February 2009, it’s received a number of reviews.
Please click on the review title to read the full review.
A Fascinating Read… Exciting and Unnerving
Review by Kelly A. Harmon at SFReader.com
****************************************
“A highly recommended instant classic”
Review By Josee Morgan of Apex Reviews
***************************************
“One of the greatest independently published science fiction novels of our time.”
Review By Eric Jones from BookReview.com
***************************************
“A gripping read that will keep readers up at night.”
Review By Holly Chase Williams from Foreword Clarion Reviews
**************************************
“Achieves a near flawless rhythm as the narrative builds. His prose… is as gifted as it is fearless”
Review By Norm Goldman from The American Chronicle
1 Comment »
Leave a Reply
Buy the Book at Amazon
Author blog: Tyranny of the Prefrontal Cortex- Video of Tyranny of the Prefrontal Cortex presentation May 26, 2012
- “Where am I? Among what do I move?” May 22, 2012
- Presentation at “Towards a Science of Consciousness” April 20, 2012
- Towards a Science of Consciousness January 14, 2012
- “Ensnared in an inescapable web” May 24, 2011
- Author blog: Finding the li
- When I die June 11, 2011
- The li of shared arousal May 11, 2011
- What’s The Point? December 6, 2010
- Trust November 28, 2010
- A Constitution for a Democracy of Consciousness November 2, 2010
There is nothing exciting nor invigorating nor classic nor fearless about this “novel”. It is not Sci Fi.
It is entirely flawed and I can prove it. Without using any mathematical formula(s).
Shame others have to resort to using mathematics (proofed) as an explanation for the infinate. To “proof” imposes the limits of third dimension and the originator(s) of the formula itself.
To assign mathematics to theory or theoretical physics nullifies theory. However, the use of math, does provide a rather successful illusion that some one or “science” must “know” because the majority of human beings cannot comprehend what they see as word salad by the numbers.
(Actually, people by deciding that these formulas are “total bs” do comprehend).
Those individuals/institutions that insist on mathematics, can join the ranks of that cretin, Stephen Hawking, a fraud. His “string theory” is flawed. Simply for this fact. The name, “String”. The only thing I can take from Hawking is that he appears to be fixated on his own genetalia ie: The Big Bang. And, of course “The Universe is Expanding” until it just goes “pop” like a condom.
Hawking presents his “pop goes the weasel” ‘theory’ as being attributed measurements from the Hubble project. Incorrect. What Hubble measured and documented were three occasions where The Universe “sped up”. That, has to do with “time” and, again, limited by our own measument(s) of time. There were three “shifts” and, when each occurred, the Universe sped up.
I can pose the rhetorical question. What is it about the infinate that scares the ever living life out of…?